Showing posts with label Theory. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Theory. Show all posts
Tuesday, 27 September 2016
Friday, 23 September 2016
Wednesday, 21 September 2016
Tuesday, 20 September 2016
Reception Theory-Hall
Reception Theory was formulated in the 1970's by Stuart Hall (and David Morlie). The theory states that a text does not have a singular meaning, it potentially has thousands, and each meaning is dependent upon the person who is viewing the text. The meaning is influenced by your culture, gender, social status, life experience, religion, ect...
You create your own meaning-Audience identification.
This gives power to both ends of the text-audience and creators
There are two parts to the premises:
- Encoding-The person who creates the text put in what they want it to mean-Has certain signs and signifiers to achieve this (genre/camera angles/location/ect)
- Decoding-The audience interprets these signifiers- The creators want us to decode what they set our, however according to our individual experiences we may interpret it differently.
Three basic readings that we decode
- Dominant Reading-What most people will understand from the text and agree what it's about-Fits in with what the creator wants it to mean.
- Negotiated Reading-We basically see it it the intended way, but because of something about the audience member they may see it in a different way (as a result of individual experiences)
- Oppositional Reading-The audience member takes it in a totally different way to how it was intended (women are portrayed in a certain way /feminists may fine it oppressive and deeply offensive).
Sunday, 18 September 2016
Saturday, 17 September 2016
Friday, 16 September 2016
Symbolic Codes - Bathes
- He was a French Philosopher
- Barthes generally focused on literature however went onto applying his theory to media in his later life.
- The theory is focused on CODES
- Semiotics-A study of cultural signs and symbols (e.g. Red=danger)
-
Roland Barthes describes a text as: "a galaxy of signifiers, not a structure of signifieds; it has no beginning; it is reversible; we gain access to it by several entrances,
none of which can be authoritatively declared to be the main one; the codes it
mobilizes extend as far as the eye can read, they are indeterminable...the
systems of meaning can take over this absolutely plural
text, but their number is never
closed, based as it is on the infinity
of language..."
- - No right or wrong way to interpret
- - There is no right entrance
- - “infinity of language” - It can go on forever
- - Anything can be a symbol
- - ANYTHING can signify EVERYTHING
- - One is no more important that the other
- - “Plural texts”-Paradoxical-One text had lots of different meanings not one set meaning
- - “Their number if never closed” People will always be interpreting it.
- - “We gain access to it by several entrances”- Everyone watches something for completely different reasons and there’s no set way to engage
- - “A galaxy of signifiers, not a structure of signifieds”- A whole range of things to interpret
- - The meaning is created by US not the creator
He states there are FIVE CODES:
o The Enigma/ Proairetic Code (ACT) – Avoids telling the truth-Creates Mystery
o The Hermeneutic Code (HER) -
Builds tension through little incidents creating short moments of tension
o
The Symbolic Code (SYM) – Meaning of connotation – EVERYTHING (e.g.Red=Danger/Passion/Lust/Blood/Violence/ect…)
o
The Cultural Code (REF) – Themes that go across a whole film (Twelve
Years a slave- slavery) – Links to Binary Opposites
o
The Semantic Code (SEM)
– Depending on our culture we will interpret the film in different ways (e.g.
cowboy films-Native Americans would see these and unfair and full of prejudise)
Thursday, 15 September 2016
Wednesday, 14 September 2016
Tuesday, 13 September 2016
Monday, 12 September 2016
Discuss the genre conventions in three films and compare how they appear to an audience.
The three thriller films that I have chosen are; Psycho
which is a 1960’s psychological horror thriller and is one of the first
thrillers ever produced, directed and produced by Alfred Hitchcock and was
based on the novel ‘Psycho’ by Robert Bloch; Gone Girl which is a 2014
psychological thriller directed by Davis Fincher and based on the book Gone Girl
by Gillian Flynn and finally Coraline which is a fantasy thriller directed
written and produced by Henry Selick and based on Neil Gailman’s book also
called Coraline.

The film Gone girl is a 2014 psychological thriller and as
it is rather modern had changed or entirely missed out on some of the
conventions that we saw in Psycho.
Before the narrative of the film even starts the audience Is already put
into a state of emergency as the titles are only on the screen for around 3
seconds, making the audience feel forced to rush to read the names (in a
similar way to Psycho the titles already put us in a state of alarm and may
foreshadow to events that may happen in the rest of the film). The, also,
non-diegetic music is rather different to psycho as it is more slow paced
however just as effectively gives of an eerie atmosphere which also add to the
sense of emergency for the audience. Similar to Psycho the first shot of a
character that we, the audience, see is of a blond woman head with a man’s hand
stroking her hair. Without the need for any dialogue this scene creates tension
because of the slowness of the man’s hand on her head and also because it seems
to give of some kind of possessive attitude that the man may have over the
woman, showing a rather stereotyped relationship between men and women. While
this acting of taking place the first piece of dialogue we hear is the words “I
picture cracking her lovely scull” this almost immediately adds a psychopathic
image for the man in this shot as it is a hugely violent phrase, which makes the reader feel worried for this ‘poor’
woman. Although we then find out later on that this woman is his wife allowing
the audience to realise that he is just referring to the fact that their
marriage is breaking down. Then the girl turns around and we see her face
properly and it is almost as if she is looking into the camera making the
audience feel a connection towards her. The location is in a rather urban area
which is quite different to a typical thriller however as it is a modern film
set recently it may be vital to the film. What is strange but clever about this
film is that we think the woman is the victim and the male is the antagonist
however it is the opposite way round, which would probably be a surprise for
the audience and make them feel uneasy as they don’t know what the film is
going to throw at them, this also is a good way of challenging the stereotypes
of gender roles. Generally this film uses the majority of conventions that are
typical to a thriller and that’s what makes it a good, tense and exciting film
however the way they have change these features as well has made it stand
out and not only makes the audience question what is really going on but also
how they hold and see thrillers as a genre of film.


able to be replicated making it less scary for the young children, but can also be seen as taking away a vital aspect of thriller (the possibility that this could happen to you). This film is the only film out of the three that I have chosen that shows women (in this case a women monster and a young girl) as being bot the antagonist and protagonist. Overall I think Coraline is a really interesting and clever (and personally one of my favourite) films and cunningly navigates the fact that it’s a child’s film but also being careful not to lose what makes it a thrilling and genuinely scary film.
Generally these films are all extremely different yet rather
similar but I feel that there is no way of being able to choose which of off
these films see more effect as they are
all so different and for different audiences. Personally I feel that my
favourite is Coraline as it plays with the typical conventions and make it into
its own film, however I do also appreciate Psycho as the first mainstream film
that was created that was a thriller. Overall I believe that each of these
films hold their own in the thriller genre and all effectively establish what a
thriller film is.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)