Friday 17 February 2017

Welcome


I am Yolanda Wallbanks, candidate number 1232, and this is my AS Media Level blog.

These 105 blogs have documented my progress through the research, pre-production and production of the two minute film opening, 'Hide & Seek', that me and my group have created.

I worked in a group with Lauren Ramsden, Winn Kan and Kirsty Bryan.

I have worked extremely hard both individually and as a group on these blog posts and I really hope you enjoy them.

Friday 10 February 2017

Evaluation Question 2




Transcript of what I said:
In creating our final media product we looked at how we would and have represented different social groups. There is a large variety of social groups that the group focused our characters on, and I believe that we have effectively presented particular aspects of these groups.

In our two minute film opening we had quite a focus on age. The two main protagonists are depicted as teenagers, when we were in the process of creating the idea of our film we knew that we wanted to have our protagonists are teenagers not only to relate it to our primary target audience, but to create an idea that they are both vulnerable but independent and able to make decisions at the same time. I believe that in the film we have both challenged and conformed to the stereotypes of the ‘typical’ teenager. Teenagers are thought to be loud, obnoxious, rebellious, out of control and always up to no good. In the character of Charlie we have challenged these stereotypes as we have presented her a rather nice quiet girl who is worried about breaking the law and getting into trouble but is being pressured by her friend to. However the character of Tyler was presented as opposite to this and fits with the negative stereotypes that come with adolescence. She is demanding, rebellious and up to no good as she is coercing her timid friend to break into a abandoned barn and break the law. The character of Charlie creates a link to the idea of the negative dominant representation of young people being shows as disrespectful and exhibiting ‘yobbish’/anti-social behaviour, however the personality of Tyler goes against this idea.
Another point to make is that the way we effectively portrayed two opposites of teenagers, this helps prevent the idea of moral panics (Stanley Cohen 1972) surrounding teenagers and put them in a generally more balanced light. In addition the contrast between the two teen characters creates a slight feel of unrest in the audience adding to the overall enigmatic and uncertain feel of the opening, similarly the antagonist character creates an enigmatic quality centred around age as he causes the audience to question how old he is compared to Charlie and Tyler.

In our media product we have a mixture of both men and women presented, we did this not only because our target audience are made up of both males and females, but because we wanted to have a equal representation of both genders.
We had decided very early on that our antagonist was going to be a male. The way we presented the antagonist is rather stereotypical as males are usually the antagonists in thrillers, we did this because we wanted to have the contrast between the male antagonist and the female protagonists to make him seem all the menacing and scary.
We gave Tyler and Charlie gender neutral names because we didn't decide on their gender until we cast the two actors (Yoli and Tyler). As a group we made a conscious decision to both challenge the stereotypes that the film industry place on women however not straying too far from what our audience would see as the norm. We did this by creating two extremely complex and intriguing characters that made the whole opening sequence realistic and interesting.
We presented the character of Tyler as small but feisty, she is very dominant and is happy to do whatever she wants with no regards to what happens to those around her, this is not normal for female characters in a conventional thriller film as they are usually portrayed as feeble and weak minded. The reason we decided to make the flash forward at the beginning of the sequence show Tyler as panicked and hysterical was to not only show that women can be both leaders and victims but also to create a sense of unrest in the idea that the character who the audience would believe to be the final girl of the film has actually been captured and made to face unimaginable torture. The contrast of the two completely different emotions of confidence and terror creates trepidation in the audience throughout as they know that something bad will happen however they do not know when.
We decided to create a more timid and uneasy personality for the character of Charlie. As a group we decided that the contrast between Tyler's dominant, fearless attitude and Charlie's apprehensive persona would create a feeling of foreboding and distrust in the audience as they would not know who they are supposed to side with or believe. We have depicted women as both strong and independent but also as victims and feeble, however we made a decision to make sure that they are not just passive objects of male desires, as described in Mulveys ‘Male Gaze’ theory, or as women who are solely there for objectivities as John Berger observed in all forms of media. 
A small point to make is that we made a conscious decision to leave out certain aspects of social groups. For example we made a decision to not indicate what sexuality our characters are so that we take away the idea that women are just sexual objects.
I believe that as a group we effectively took on the idea of gender in the film industry and made sure that we gave a balanced and appropriate view. Making our final product all the more powerful and enigmatic.

I generally feel that as a group we have effectively found a balance between challenging the unnecessary stereotypes that the film industry put on specific social group but at the same time we kept certain stereotypes that are important when it came to making specific aspects clear to the audience.

Thursday 5 January 2017

Focus Group - Fifth Draft



Watching our final piece they were very happy with how far we have come, the only thing that may need improvement was the title as the end.

Wednesday 4 January 2017

Editing Update - Fifth and Final Draft

We had very little to edit for our final draft it was generally just little touch ups and quicker cut clips to make the whole thing flow better. 

We found that after this phase of editing we felt we were definitely finished and after showing the opening to our focus group they also confirmed that there was nothing that they felt we could improve. 

Overall I am extremely proud of how we worked as a group. Looking back at the whole editing process I feel that it was a lot harder than I was expecting ti to be however I have thoroughly enjoyed the journey and as well as being proud of my group as a whole I am hugely proud of myself and the excellent work I feel I have done. We have produced a very good piece of work that is of extremely high quality and I am very happy with what we have produced. 

Monday 2 January 2017

Editing Update - Third and Forth Draft


Once again as the head editor Kirsty took lead role in the editing however we both worked very closely together as i always sat with her with her when she was editing, helping er figure out the editing software and deciding whether something she did had the right look and fitted with the conventions. 

Since the last draft we had added music and sound effects which we felt were very effective and made our product seen very professional and of a high quality, it also added to the suspense of the whole opening as the music builds up the tension (for example when they open the barn door the music goes very loud indicating/foreshadowing to the bad that will come).


We also colour corrected some of the scenes to make it look nicer as a whole. We made the opening flash-forward darker to allude to the coming terror and fear in the film. In addition we made the part when the two characters are outside more blue to make it seem even colder than it already did. Although these were only slight nearly unnoticeable differences I feel it was very effective.

We finally got round to adding the titles of the cast and crew as well as the logo so it was clear that it was our production. However we did hit a snag as we realised that out company logo was black on a black background so we made the decision to have a different one rather than re-edit our original one. 
  GIF
I felt that although i was very disappointed that we couldn't use the logo that i had created (and was very proud of) we made the right decision and came up with a very interesting new way of presenting our production company name



  GIF  GIFPersonally I finally edited together the clip that I was yet to do and I felt that I was very effective. It gave another level of fear to the piece and made it even more scary.

I feel that we have nearly finished the editing of our product, however there are some small bits that need to be tweaked slightly.